data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc391/cc39158ed773e9bf4228cc78190d2333426f1ce6" alt=""
The FDA Bans Red No. 3: A Small Step Forward for #MAHA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39f25/39f2573b69f629b87fefc4c6b0318abe5433b01b" alt=""
The #MAHA movement (Make America Healthy Again) is gaining momentum to provide safer and more nutritious foods to stores and schools. This extends to the pharmaceutical industry too. This week, a small victory was announced: Red No.3 is being banned.
The FDA is revoking the authorization for the use of FD&C Red No. 3 as a matter of law, based on the Delaney Clause of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). The FDA is amending its color additive regulations to no longer allow for the use of FD&C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs in response to a 2022 color additive petition.
The move acts on a November 2022 petition submitted by multiple advocacy organizations and individuals, including the Center for Science in the Public Interest and the Environmental Working Group, which cited links to cancer. The decision by the federal agency also follows in the footsteps of California, whose government banned the additive in October 2023.
The petition requested the agency review whether the Delaney Clause applied and cited, among other data and information, two studies that showed cancer in laboratory male rats exposed to high levels of FD&C Red No. 3 due to a rat specific hormonal mechanism. The way that FD&C Red No. 3 causes cancer in male rats does not occur in humans. Relevant exposure levels to FD&C Red No. 3 for humans are typically much lower than those that cause the effects shown in male rats. Studies in other animals and in humans did not show these effects; claims that the use of FD&C Red No. 3 in food and in ingested drugs puts people at risk are not supported by the available scientific information.
The Delaney Clause, enacted in 1960 as part of the Color Additives Amendment to the FD&C Act, prohibits FDA authorization of a food additive or color additive if it has been found to induce cancer in humans or animals. This is not the first time the agency revoked an authorization based on the Delaney Clause. For example, in 2018, the FDA revoked the authorization for certain synthetic flavors based on the Delaney Clause in response to a food additive petition.
FD&C Red No. 3 is a synthetic food dye that gives foods and drinks a bright, cherry-red color. The FDA estimates that FD&C Red No. 3 is not as widely used in food and drugs when compared to other certified colors based on information available in third-party food product labeling databases, food manufacturers’ websites and other public information, and the FDA’s certification data. FD&C Red No. 3 has been primarily used in certain food products, such as candy, cakes and cupcakes, cookies, frozen desserts, and frostings and icings, as well as certain ingested drugs.
Manufacturers who use FD&C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs will have until January 15, 2027 or January 18, 2028, respectively, to reformulate their products. Other countries still currently allow for certain uses of FD&C Red No. 3 (called erythrosine in other countries). However, foods imported to the U.S. must comply with U.S. requirements.
In 2021, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment study found red dye No. 3 can make children vulnerable to behavioral issues, such as decreased attention. The report also concluded that federal levels for safe intake of food dyes at that time may not protect children’s brain health. The study noted that the current legal levels, set decades ago by the FDA, didn’t consider new research, according to the Environmental Working Group.
Overall, this ban is a step forward in the #MAHA movement of returning food, beverage, and pharmaceutical manufacturers to their proper mission, providing safe and effective products. However, whether the ban will save a single life is uncertain. A much bigger impact would come from banning processed red meats, known cancer causers in humans, from schools as a start.
You Might Also Enjoy...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc391/cc39158ed773e9bf4228cc78190d2333426f1ce6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/468ec/468ec060efafb4ee05cfd4ec054b96cd04bff459" alt=""
Can Dietary Niacin Reduce the Risk of Heart Disease?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b78cb/b78cb984bdf2a4cbf5ddd7839c895d42359ad558" alt=""
STATIN MEDICATIONS: ARE THEY RUINING OR PROTECTING YOUR BRAIN?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d64b5/d64b5acfb0e55941ef43188a33e7b378ababbeb7" alt=""
Is it Healthier to Walk in Forests vs. Cities (Forest Bathing)?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bac5/4bac5a33059d2df4510a2bb6f14a0688a605f0f1" alt=""
Why I Order So Many Coronary CT Angiograms (Cleerly): Heart Attack Prevention
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c1e0/1c1e0235b48fb80f974d0ce1ae5d7f0eab538f0d" alt=""